The primary reason for the disaster of uncontrolled immigration has been indiscriminate access to British citizenship and all its attendant benefits .
That folly was the work of  renegade politicians; and since no government can be bound by the actions of its predecessors, the first piece of legislation by a  nationalist government must be a Citizens’ Charter including the following elements:

1. Full citizenship status is restricted to persons of British(English,Scottish,Welsh or Ulster) ancestry ; but some
‘naturalised’ Europeans may be granted honorary status.
2. A  national Citizens’ Register will be compiled, incorporating and
eventually replacing current registers of births, marriages and deaths.
3. Only those people on the Citizens’ Register will have a legal entitlement to
* A British passport
* Ownership of land and property in the U.K.
* Rented accommodation in the public sector
* Employment in the armed forces, police, civil service, local government and other public services;
* Employment in the private sector where there are suitably-qualified British citizens available;
* Participation in elections
* Social service benefits
* Free education
* Non-emergency NHS treatment.
4. Aliens will not acquire British citizenship by marriage or ‘mixed’
parentage .
5. It will be a criminal offence to conceal or falsify information pertaining
to entries in the Citizens Register.

This legislative ‘keystone’ is all that is needed to deter unwanted immigrants and
encourage the voluntary repatriation of  those already here.  As a central part of the
nationalist manifesto it would certainly get overwhelming support from the British public, while disposing of the ‘final solution’ cattle-truck scenarios of  left-wing
propagandists.   As we all know to our cost, in the ‘liberal’ climate where anything goes, everything goes ; thus the indiscriminate granting of  British citizenship by
renegade politicians has been a ‘welcome’ mat for all the world’s opportunists .
It is equivalent to legalising theft by criminalising private ownership.
The proposed Citizens’ Charter will of course include all the necessary civil liberties details in a modern democracy, such as freedom of speech .  It will be phased in to allow sufficient time for non-citizens to settle their affairs before departure from the U.K. .   All that then remains of the Repatriation Programme are the following items

* Compulsory repatriation of alien criminals, those habitually unemployed,   
      and anti-British campaigners;
* Funding of  travel and resettlement grants for repatriated migrants.
* Special dispensations for elderly aliens and schoolchildren
.
There is nothing whatsoever ‘fascist’ about the proposed Citizens’ Charter ; it simply incorporates the essentials of national identity and fundamental civil liberties.
Accordingly, the nationalist election campaigns should eschew reference to compulsory repatriation and simply put the Citizen’s Charter up front  .
No doubt the Left will still foam at the mouth over its implications, but will have no credible alternative to offer a concerned electorate.
     
The population is actually divisible into three main categories for all governmental purposes , namely
   
* Those qualifying for full or honorary citizenship status and
entitlements;
* Aliens
* Indeterminate ; i.e. individuals with prima facie entitlement to  citizenship, but whose conduct and record do not merit the
full range of benefits attaching thereto. Such people would therefore be given provisional citizenship, limiting their entitlements and access to the full range of benefits.
 . 
Alongside the Citizens’ Register, therefore, there will need to be an Aliens Register and a Renegade Register .     Entrants to the Aliens Register will get a Temporary Residence Permit with an expiry date up to twelve months hence ; and those unable to produce this ID will be denied access to the full range of citizenship benefits pending their repatriation.  Entries in the Citizens’ Register will be based on a standard questionnaire and include two nominees already registered.  Anyone falsifying the questionnaire would automatically become liable to prosecution and may be included in the Renegade Register.     Anyone nominated by not less than ten registered but unrelated Citizens for inclusion in the Renegade Register will have to complete a special questionnaire for scrutiny be officials of the  Citzenship Registry  .  Anyone denied full citizenship as a result of this scrutiny will have right of appeal to a Citizens’ Panel in their locality. Meanwhile they would only get provisional citizenship status.  
Given modern information technology the above arrangements are entirely feasible and certainly necessary if a nationalist government is to take hold of the situation.
Accordingly, they should be tabled in any discussion of the pros and cons of national identity cards or  immigration .  They are not negotiable .


F Kimbal Johnson
January 2005