VICTORY OR THE DEATH OF WESTERN IDEALS
by Frank Kimbal-Johnson

Any culture  - religious or secular - worthy of the name is necessarily dynamic, seeking to expand its power and influence at whatever cost to its rivals. So much is evident at the personal level where, if you lose your grip on your own beliefs, you’ll very soon be in the grip of someone else’s.  And make no mistake; there are no neutrals in the war of survival; so those not manifestly winning it are already losing it.   Devout believers in any cause therefore always command respect, if only because they are serious contenders for the dominant role in human affairs.  Religious devotees believe they are serving the purposes of a God seeking fulfilment in this world; from which it follows that their God is bound to favour and support their activities rather than those of unbelievers.  

So it is hopelessly ingenuous and certainly dangerous to imagine that a militant faith like Militant Islam can be ‘accommodated’ within Western society. Fundamentalist Islam itself dictates only three choices for the unbelievers: conversion, taxed servitude, or death.  

Given the stubborn resistance to conversion by most Westerners, therefore, the homicidal behaviour of Muslim fundamentalists towards infidels becomes inevitable.  This radical incompatibility of Islam and the Western ethos was of no great moment before the advent of easy international travel and mass migration of Third World peoples.  But now, through the folly and treachery of renegade politicians, it overshadows our present and puts our national future in question.   . 

Would anyone in their right mind tolerate the presence in their household of Al-Queda terrorists obviously determined to evict and ready, if need be, to murder them? Well of course not, you may reply; which can only mean that this country is nowadays governed by people so far removed from sanity as to represent a collective death wish. (One is here reminded of an old saying among the Bedouins: ‘If you see a man about to jump down a well, give him a push’).  

But freedom of belief is axiomatic in Western society; a state of affairs which is obviously intolerable to militant Muslims.  Accordingly, they are sooner or later bound to express that intolerance, with their assurance of divine approval however atrocious the result for their fatuously indulgent hosts.   So it ought to be clear enough by now that a fanatical Fundamentalist Muslim-free country is a pre-condition for the security and indeed survival of the Western ethos. Thus the failure of Westerners to acknowledge this has to be ascribed to plain stupidity, wilful ignorance or downright treachery.   And never forget that a militant culture cannot be contained or resisted except by another culture, which is at least as determined on its own predominance in human affairs.   In other words, you cannot persuade Islamic militants to be less assertive; you can only show them strength of conviction they can never hope to subdue and replace.   Alas, it is precisely because Western society has apparently lost the will to defend its own ethos that militant Muslims are nowadays exploiting the laxity of immigration controls to expand their power and influence in the world. They see all the liberal counsels of  ‘multicultural tolerance’ as further evidence of Western decadence, and regard its advocates as ‘useful idiots’ much as the Communists did during the Cold War.    

Since, in the most literal sense, Islam cannot be ‘accommodated’ in Western society, if only because its devotees are unlikely to abjure their faith, the repatriation of Fundamental Muslim immigrants has to be undertaken as a fundamental element of national security.   

This then is the finale Crusade, to be undertaken with no less conviction and resolution than that which infused our ancestors in their 11^th century conflict with Saracens and later battles with Islam at the gates of Europe.  But renegade politicians have flung those gates wide open since World War 2, and today’s Militant Muslim factions see this as their golden opportunity to achieve everything their own ancestors vainly attempted against a powerfully entrenched Christian civilization.  What they could not hope to achieve by military might has now been given to them on a plate by Western politicians falling over themselves to

Islamify our laws, schools and public services and allow more and bigger mosques to loom in the English landscape. And make no mistake, the Militant Muslim presence is not something merely added to British culture; it wishes to replace it!  

Our response as a people to this appalling situation has to be urgently mobilised and uncompromising; resisting any ‘accommodation’ of the Fanatics and at the same time explicitly asserting the superiority of our own culture anywhere and everywhere.

Among other things this requires our monarchy to reaffirm its obligation to defend the Christian faith and decline any invitation to welcome possible terrorists; failing which it loses any legitimacy in British affairs of state.   At the same time all our laws, cultural traditions, media channels, public services and educational arrangements must be seen to make no concessions to the alien opportunists now becoming increasingly clamant.  So let us see the Crusaders’ banner everywhere in our homeland; the more assertively where it is most resented, and most especially in the face of renegade politicians and media propagandists.  Whatever your religious persuasion, as a patriot you have a sacred duty to rally to the Red Cross on a white ground (as well as the Union Flag).   Let it appear in all your social engagements, products and publications; in your fashion accessories, shop windows, company logos and advertisements; on your car rear windows, key rings and various utensils.   Wherever it appears, British people will know they have the security and camaraderie that only racial /religious kinship can provide.

It will thus mark the frontiers of our civilization.  Those rallying to such banners, such frontiers, are the stuff which made this country the envy of the world for centuries, while those who skulk in suburban or over-privileged retreats and affect ‘enlightened’ disdain for such overt patriotism are cowards and traitors.  It bears repeating therefore: there are no neutrals in this war for racial and national survival.

Law abiding Muslims must make clear that they distance themselves from these Fanatical Islamic lunatics or the British people will and are lumping them all in the same pot.

F Kimbal Johnson

September 2006