As a new party, the BPP is still refining its Year I campaigns schedule, though we DO have various activities - carried over and being revived or topped-up by former Nationalist Alliance and White Nationalist Party members who have joined us - under review.

For that reason, we are content in this Bulletin to give some due credit to the BNP's Epping Forest Unit - away the lads and lassies - and to highlight that Unit's local Elections and street campaigning tactics. We also make no apologies, 'Know Thine Enemy', for lifting the basic information for this article from the 'Searchlight' magazine website of Gerry Gable.

Thanks to 'Searchlies', we have spotted a key area of Essex about which the Reds are increasingly concerned and from study of whose BNP achievements any BPP activist worth his or her salt should be picking up hot tips for future political activism ( we would also recommend that 'Searchlies', Anal and AFA step up their winter patrols in South Wales; thanks to Ben, howdy Ben, and our developing Krew of new supporters down in the valleys, the BPP's creation is now being felt there, too ).

Steve Smith's superb booklet on how White Nationalists waged their successful Burnley Local Elections Campaigns tells just one victory story from the insider viewpoint of those who fought those campaigns. Some day, hopefully as members of the BPP and under the banner of 'Imperium Press', the BNP's Epping Forest area campaigns team will publish their story. 

Given the sheer panic, the Opposition disorganisation and the eventual bureaucratic brutality which that Unit's campaigns have provoked, given the amount of free local and national publicity which those campaigns have generated and given the admirable level of public support which they have notched up, they are an excellent example of the sort of Literature and Propaganda scenario in action, producing foundation-building  'good results', which this writer, in Nationalist Week, suggested can be achieved by carefully planned and systematically conducted use of BPP materials. 

The BPP undoubtedly disagrees with much that the BNP says. We loudly and strongly differ with the way it goes about its national activities and we clearly have - as they have with us - major differences with Nick Griffin and certain of his apparatchiks. Where the BNP membership, or that of any other White Nationalist party, achieves success, however, we will gladly, objectively, applaud that success and set our best minds to drawing and applying the lessons to be learned from it. 

A measure of the Epping Forest BNP's success is the fact that, on Saturday, 08 October, 2005, the Left summoned its platoons of ageing and juvenile Homo Crappiens supporters to the Loughton Broadway Ward of Debden in Essex. There, at 11a.m on Saturday morning, 'Redbridge and Epping Forest Together' planned to stage an anti - BNP leafletting protest.

Following last week's anti-BNP leafletting and petition exercise, this latest action not only confirms that White Nationalism is a force to be reckoned with in the Epping Forest area; it also reveals the impotence of the Liberal - Left movement in being unable (a) adequately to address the serious local problems encountered by the local majority population and (b) to prevent the BNP's relentless base-building in the Broadway Ward(s) area.

As a face-saving exercise in advance of next year's May Elections, the weekend's Red Dwarfs action in Loughton was seen by street-wise locals for what it is. A cack-handed, overdue and sticky plaster broo-ha which will make a lot of noise, spin some fancy words and achieve next to nothing.

In June 2004, in contrast, the BNP's eye-on-the-ball alertness to Epping Forest needs and worries, its local ability quickly to adapt party propaganda to those worries and the sheer force of that propaganda's impact upon the local electorate saw BNP candidate Terence Farr secure his easy and unexpected election to a seat on Epping and District Council. 

Now then, before we give Terry Farr a standing ovation, it is worth noting some of the less happier moments experienced by that local politician and to highlight the never-ceasing array of political weaponry which UK White Nationalist political figures have endured and will continue to endure in our onward trek to victory. 

Terry Farr would not claim to have been born on a cosmically significant day or that his birth was heralded by the emergence of a new star. Nor has he any known pretensions to national statesmanship. He has, however, his critics say, confused privately held views on multi-racial co-existence with what he thinks is  - but what Epping District Council, alias Zog, most emphatically says is not - a politically acceptable way of expressing those views.

The word 'unfortunate' is used because Councillor Farr chose to be somewhat expressive about his views on asylum seekers and British housing stocks in letters (i) to Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality and also a fellow subject of a Nationalist Week 'Spotlight' article and (ii) to John Prescott, MP and a High Priest of the New Labour political cabal.  

Recently suspended from office for three months and now a BNP website hero, Terry Farr insists that he has done nowt wrong. He had, when last checked, refused to participate in what he describes as a racially biased 'racial awareness' course. The Council reject his claims and insists that Farr must do penance by completing the course. Farr had also been ordered to attend training courses in understanding the Council's Code of Conduct, its Equality programmes and its Equal Opportunities Policies.

Farr's crime - and, Met Watchers please note, we merely repeat Left-wing Press usage of them and leave our readers to arrive at their own conclusions - was to write the following words: 'One solution to racial harmony is for (ethnic minorities) to stay in their self-created sweat-shops and leave us to enjoy the English countryside'.  

With only one vote against and one abstention, some 40 fellow Council members also voted Terry Farr off of a Council Committee. 

In addition to this, Councillor Farr and a fellow (Jewish) BNP Councillor of Epping District Council, Pat Richardson, have been at the centre of a controversy which has, on one side of the stage, seen a Liberal Democrat Councillor be supported by the Council after calling the BNP 'Nazis' while, on the other side, Terry Farr has accused the Lib-Dem Councillor of having made 'an anti-Jewish Nazi comment' to Councillor Richardson.

The saga continues but even these seemingly negative matters guarantee the Epping Forest BNP shed loads of free publicity, screeds of official paperwork about their existence on the Council, endless hours of official and public debate mentioning their names and a sure-fire, high-grade, profile which will help to keep the BNP name in the public eye.

None of this, of course, guarantees the Epping Forest BNP Unit future political success - though the local Unit might well come over to us, back a BPP candidate and score a bigger success - but the local team's achievements to date merit positive appraisal.

What rocketed Terry Farr to electoral success in June 2004 was a BNP campaign which - true or false - claimed that housing stock was being set aside for Government-allocated Asylum Seekers and that these Asylum Seekers would have priority over local Applicants. The BNP campaign went so far as to identify specific local addresses.

By the time the local Council got its act together, by the time the various departments had finished squabbling over the allegations and finally got round to making a definitive statement denying the claims, the BNP had seized the publicity initiative, had secured the political high ground and was not entirely unhappy - more publicity - with the official denial. 

True or false, what mattered was that the BNP propaganda had struck a nerve with local voters. It had exposed a rich and ripe-for-mining vein of genuine local anxiety and anger and the BNP had in place a sound local Unit able to mix locally - suited campaign materials with nationally-produced Party propaganda materials.

More importantly, the BNP KNEW ITS TERRAIN AND IT KNEW THE DEPTH OF LOCAL FEELING AND HOW TO RESPOND TO IT.

It pitched its propaganda at the right time and at the right emotional level, the populace wanted to believe what the BNP said and seeds were planted.

Result: the BNP confounded its critics, the Opposition were caught napping and the BNP won a Council seat. 

Sixteen months later, the New Left, its Hobgoblin Kommissars and its 'Under Protest' Tory and Lib-Dem camp followers have suddenly awakened to what is happening in Loughton Broadway. 

A New Dawn of White Nationalist community politics in action has brought local voters a moment of clarity.  

The fog of war has been lifted and the flags which  local  BNP voters see around them are not those of Whitehall's stage army and its lead-from-the-rear Colonel Blimps but those of loyal and true White Nationalism.

As in Burnley, and as will be the case when the BPP itself stands front and centre on the national political battlefield, small groups of dedicated, imaginative and resourceful White Nationalists CAN achieve great things for the wee folk of these islands.

As BNP supporters have done for their party in Loughton Broadway, fellow White Nationalists will steadily raise the BPP's standards across England, in Wales ( a special renewed 'hello' to Ben and our new Band of Racial Brothers down in South Wales ), in Ulster and in Scotland.

In farms, villages, town and cities across the UK, we can time and time again apply the propaganda and street action lessons learned by the BNP in Broadway and by our fellow Northerners in Burnley.

The BPP, it goes without saying, is no BNP clone organisation.

We in the BPP are steadily developing our own unique and very special to us identity on the opposite wing of our vibrant movement. We are radically and exceptionally different parties with painfully developed different policies and outlooks. In many areas of philosophy and practise, it's all too sadly a case of 'never the twain shall meet'. These realities cannot change. On such matters we long ago agreed to disagree. 

These differences do not, however, prevent us, while crossing such a commonly fought over battleground, from kicking the ball about with fellow political soldiers who defend the common goal of a shared White Nationalist seizure of territory from Zog and its mercenary legions.

We can, in this commonly waged ideological Total War, still swop and learn from front-line experiences which will help us all to survive and which will fortify us as we fight the common enemy, not each other, both today and on as many tomorrows as it takes for us to achieve Final Victory.

Meantime, as they say in the SAS: ' Lead, follow or get out of the way.' BPP coming through!