I
stated in my speech in London on Saturday, April 19th 2008, that
British Nationalism has always had two very seperate streams competing
for control of the National Movement itself in the United Kingdom -
populism and racial-Nationalism. This new century has seen those terms
revised to populism becoming ethno-nationalism and racial-nationalism
now being re-labelled White Nationalism.
Throughout the tumultuous days of the 1970's National Front - populism
and racial-nationalism constantly battled with each other for control
of the Front. The racial-nationalists, under Tyndall and Webster
normally came out winning, resulting in the Populists marching off to
start numerous new and short lived parties.
When the British National Party was formed under the firm leadership of
John Tyndall, populism was off the agenda we thought for
good, and there is no doubt that between the years 1982 and
1999, the British National Party can be firmly described as White
Nationalist. Significantly too there was not ONE split from the BNP
during this period and I put this down to its ideological cohesivness.
Since the departure of John Tyndall and the advent of Mr.Griffin, the
BNP has become ultra-populist and now openly rejects White Nationalism.
It describes itself now as ethno-nationalist. It is entitled to do so
if that is what its leadership wants.
This trait is also seen in just about every other European country
where ethno-nationalist groups such as the Front National and the
Freedom Party in Austria vie with White Nationalist groups for control
of their own National Movements. By a National Movement I mean the
general underlying stream of ALL Nationalists in Great Britain of
whatever group and even those not in any party but who are White
patriots. The battle for the hearts and minds of all these Nationalists
has been going on since the 1960's between the two conflicting strands
of British Nationalism.
Jorg Haider is a good example of what happens to Populist parties.
Haider achieved fast and rapid success especially in his home area of
Carinthia in Austria. His toned down nationalism, geographically based,
rejected the Aryan World view and pushed a watered down and
non-controversial package. This success was short lived.. Haider was
still labelled a 'Nazi' and has since fell from grace with the Austrian
FP to the extent that he has now left that party and formed yet another
ethno-nationalist party. The populists never learn, whatever the
country, that their watered down version of Nationalism can easily be
highjacked by the mainstream ZOG parties for a short time who just jump
on the anti-immigration bandwagon and rob the Populists of their votes
and members. This happened in 1978-79 with the NF and IS happening now as even the Marxist
Labour Party in Great Britain are rattling the 'Stop Immigration' sabre.
The basic fundamental difference between ethno-nationalism and White
Nationalism is this. Ethno-nationalism is geographically based. White
Nationalism is racially based. You even get ethno-nationalists making
ludicrous statements that if someone is born in Britain - whatever
their race - then they are British - stopping immigration is enough and
repatriation is not possible - maybe not even desirable!
White Nationalists say stop immigration too, but like the leading WN
Movement - the BPP - take the step further and insist on a phased
policy of humane but total repatriation. For us - our ideals are based
in the blood we inherited from our Aryan forefathers and which we are
passing on to our children and future White generations - and that
blood must be the blood of the Aryans - undiminished over thousands of
years!
So if you want a quick fix then by all means become an
ethno-nationalist - you MIGHT not get labelled a 'nazi' and a 'racist'
as fast as we White Nationalists do. You MIGHT achieve some good votes
in the short term. You will without any doubt attract the cosy Tory
types who feel safe and comfy with a watered down Nationalism. You
WON'T stay the course. Ethno-nationalism because it has NO deep
ideological roots will eventually collapse, just as Haider's FP - and
others - have done.
White Nationalism such as provided by the BPP asks for more. You WILL
be asked for more commitment - total in fact. You WILL be asked to work
hard for a slow reward. You WILL however be building a Movement with
deep and solid roots that will attract the people we need. The young
Whites who are disenfranchised and bewildered. They do not want an
old-type boring party. They want action.
They want to take back the streets. They want excitement and they want
a no-compromise Movement. The BPP is attracting two types of new
members - real veterans with years of service to the National Movement
and young White working class men and women who are aching for action
and the dynamism of a Movement that can light the torch of freedom that
does not wish to get into bed with the Old Party System but wishes to
bring that System crashing to the ground for the corrupt and rotten
edifice that it is!
By all means - if you want the cosy path - then become or stay an
ethno-nationalist. If you want what the BPP offer - a hard and often
bloody struggle but one that will transform the face of Great Britain
then come to us - the White Nationalists and build a Movement that will
create the future racial-state - and this one just might last a
Thousand Years after all!
Jorg Haider - once
the inspiration of European Populists - now a dismal failure and proof positive
that ethno-nationalism cannot stay the course!
