The ambassadors of 10 Muslim countries have complained to the Danish prime minister about a major newspaper's cartoons of the Prophet Mo'hamhead.

Innocent cartoons published in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten last month showed the Prophet Mo’ as a stereotypical fundamentalist. What are they meant to portray him as? a paedophile? according to the tradition, for marrying the five year old child called Aisha amongst his several wives?.

Pictorial depictions of that particular Prophet are forbidden in Islam. It is also forbidden to query the marriage of an adult whose day job was as a ‘Prophet’, to a five year old child.

Forbidden in Islam, but not in Europe?. Or is Europe now totally subservient to Islam?.

The daily newspaper published the series of cartoons, after a writer complained that nobody dared illustrate his book about Mo.
"We must quietly point out here that the drawings illustrated an article on the self-censorship which rules large parts of the Western world", the paper said.

"Our right to say, write, photograph and draw what we want to within the framework of the law exists and must endure - unconditionally!" Although the BBC and the Press can freely use the term “Muslim Countries” - Fear and self-censorship stalk Europe, preventing the BBC or the Press from ever daring to use the term Christian Countries.

The two illustrators who produced the cartoons have received death threats from followers of the absurdly named ‘religion of peace’, a religion whose immigrant extremists can now dictate which cartoons! Europeans can or cannot print.
Fear and oppression are stalking Europe as a direct result of uncontrolled asylum and one-sided immigration policy that allows non-Europeans to invade Europe. In contrast, not one single White Christian European ever, has been allowed to seek asylum or migrate to live in a Muslim country such as Saudi Arabia.
Aware of the growing threat of destruction of national unity, the destruction of social homogeneity and Islamic-Al Q'eda terror; the government has implemented a series of measures in recent years aimed at curbing immigration, which include making it harder for people to bring in foreign spouses or gain asylum in Denmark.

Queen Margrethe of Denmark in a book written by journalist Annelise Bistrup, is quoted as voicing disapproval of "these people for whom religion is their entire life".

Calling for opposition to radical Islam, she said: "We have to run the risk of being labelled in an unflattering way, because there are some things for which we should display no tolerance."
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Queen Margethe
With those limited controls, there is a still a chance that Denmark may yet be saved from the horror that is unfolding in occupied Britain. The horror of social meltdown with so-called “British Muslims” plotting, planning, and occasionally successfully carrying out mass murder, ostensibly for their religion, against the host population in one of two separate human waves of attacks in July 2005.

Daily the UK news reports other terror cases nipped in the bud, and of Britons who object to being overwhelmed by migration, being censored and jailed for questioning the folly of the government’s high-risk non-European immigration programme , a policy that threatens the very existence of a White British Race!