The Official Website of the British People's Party

VIOLATING FREEDOM: THE CONCEPT OF ‘HATE CRIMES’

By David Jones, BPP Commissioner

Britain is not a free country. I say that boldly as waves of unwanted immigration into our Islands has increased into the contempt of the wishes of the native majority, in particular from coloured lands, Parliament increasingly resorts to censorship and discrimination of what has now become the majority-held viewpoint. The majority of people believe that immigration should cease, or be very tightly curbed, and then some advocate that immigrants should adopt our culture, some advocate geographical-separation and some repatriation. Our views on this are well known and will be obvious to most normal people and it is not the purpose of this article to explain the fundamental wrongs of immigration

I wish to deal here with a specific issue, the concept of ‘Hate Crime’ laws. Since the 1960’s Parliament saw instant opposition to its destructively liberal ‘race equality’ agenda, and instead of rectifying its policy bringing it into line with public opinion, resorted to censoring the views of its more hard-line critics in order to protect themselves.

THE OUTLAWING OF OPPOSITION TO MULTICULTURALISM

Above - Neville Nagler QC: Former Chief of the ‘Board of Deputies of British Jews’, He wrote most of Great Britain’s ‘Race Laws’ as a Home Office Special Adviser during the Thatcher and Major Governments. The Board of Deputies almost succeeded in lobbying the Blair Government into banning ‘Holocaust Denial’ – i.e. asking questions about aspects of the 'Holocaust' that don’t add up!

The first ‘Race Relations Acts’ (passed in the 1960’s) violated the fundamental right to dispose of ones own property as we saw fit, effectively removing a shopkeeper or hoteliers’ right to make a free decision concerning who he sold his wares or services to. This also barred the right of people to elect Local Councils who could make similar decisions based on their voter’s opposition to coloured immigration. Laws were then promptly passed, in typically ambiguous UK legal terms, banning behaviour which was likely or intended to cause ‘harassment, alarm or distress’ to anybody based upon ones own personal viewpoint of race – another violation our right to form and act upon our own viewpoint. Under Thatcher through to Tony Blair, along with the tightening of these laws, more rules were then passed which put ‘Thought Crimes’ on to the Statute Book which then placed an obligation upon the courts to discriminatively ‘load’ the sentences handed down for of any crime where a motive based on the officially-disapproved perception of multi-racialism could be inferred, these provision are now enshrined in the Race Relations Act 2000. Since then similar violations have been legalized concerning our right to oppose religions and sexual minorities (i.e. Muslims and Homosexuals). This was trumpeted by the so-called ‘right-wing press’ as a way of fighting Islamic Extremism, but Labour politicians have since admitted that these laws were in reality intended to curb the BNP’s growth and stop them referring to Islam in their election materiel.

So that is where we stand today, and the regulations enshrined in these laws are ever shifting, the ambiguous terms of ‘likely’ and ‘intended’. And furthermore only citizen’s protections from prosecution are getting slacker. Also the under Hate Crimes provisions only justification required to arrest, swab and fingerprint someone is a mere complaint from someone who perceives ‘hate’ in whatever crime – weather true or false or even weather the crime took place or not, and make no mistake – the Plod are under increasing pressure to do this, even the nicest copper will nick you for the slightest expression of racial ‘thought crime’.

HYPOCRISY BEYOND BELIEF – THE STATE’S DOUBLE STANDARDS

Above - Establishment Marxist Trevor Phillips: His persecution of ‘racists’ by his EHRC is akin to that of Mathew Hopkin’s persecution of so-called witches. Like ‘racism’ today, perceived witchcraft made those running the industry very rich, from the inquisitors to those that sold the wood for the stake.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission recently prohibited the BNP from exercising our now outlawed freedom of association thereby declaring that it must not be a ‘White Man’s Party’, even though minorities are allowed to establish exclusive groups on their own behalf. Nick Griffin, after much tough talk and fundraising, crumpled to their demands and did not even fight his own parties’ corner but the damage was done. The BNP may have collapsed but the BPP will not, we will simply abolish formal membership and recruit selectively – abolishing open membership and opting for a ‘sponsorship’ policy – for when the day comes that the Whiteman no longer has a party he can say is exclusively his that will be the day we throw in the towel – and we promise you we will not do that!

However, this EHRC and its many local allied bodies (which include groups such as Hate Crime grassing-centre ‘Todmorden Together’, in my own Town) are bullying the patriots of these Isles funded by our own money. The Race-Hate lawyers, the special advisers, the equality officers and other useless wastes of space found throughout the Public, Private and Third Sector alike are riding on an industry, and we are the ones being leeched off in order to enable politicians to obtain block votes from ethnic and coloured minorities and they have their Apex high in the ‘hallowed halls of the EU Supreme Council and the UN. The UN is pressuring the few countries (such as Cyprus, Slovenia, Estonia and the United) still resisting ‘Hate Laws’ to adopt laws.

IT WILL BE THE TASK OF NATIONALISTS, AUTHENTIC PATRIOTS AND LIBERTARIANS ALIKE TO RESIST THE INFLUENCE OF THIS MENACE TO
FREEDOM AND STAND UP FOR TRUE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE