Men bedeviled in bid for sanctuary
Stephen Whittle, left,
and Simon Sheppard, convicted of
disseminating hate speech in
Britain, skipped bail and came to Los
Angeles in July 2008, thinking
they’d find asylum in the U.S., where
such laws are less stringent.
Instead, they have spent the last 10
months held in the Santa Ana
city jail after a federal immigration judge
denied them asylum and put
them on a slow track back to Britain.
Convicted in England of hate speech, Simon Sheppard and
Stephen Whittle fled to America.
By Dana Parsons
Los Angeles
Times -- Tuesday, June 2, 2009
When Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle stepped
off a plane at LAX in July 2008 -- a couple of jet-lagged Brits on the
lam from the United Kingdom -- they looked for the first uniformed U.S.
official they could find. Unfortunately for them, they found one.
They thought they had found safe harbor from the English court that
three days earlier had convicted them of hate-related writings
originating on their website. Rather than wait for sentencing --
expected to range from a year or two for Whittle to perhaps five years
or more for Sheppard -- the men skipped bail and hopped a plane in
Dublin, believing that U.S. free-speech traditions and the visa waivers
they secured at an Irish airport would shield them.
Sheppard says he approached a U.S. official in Los Angeles, showed him
the visa waiver and said in effect, "I'm sorry to be a nuisance, but we
want to claim political asylum in the United States."
Eleven months later, Sheppard, 52, and Whittle, 42, remain in U.S.
custody, spending their days in orange jumpsuits in the Santa Ana City
Jail and awaiting a return to England and likely jail sentences. Since
arriving in America, they haven't spent a single day as free men.
"We thought they'd hold us for a day or so," Sheppard said through a
Plexiglas window in a jail interview. "We couldn't see how they
wouldn't grant us asylum. The things we supposedly had done in Britain
aren't illegal in America."
As it turned out, that was beside the point.
The men, known as the "heretical two" to supporters, aren't in U.S.
custody because of their world views. Nor have they committed any crime
in America. Their lengthy detention is largely the product of the
asylum-seeking process that Sheppard and Whittle brought on themselves
when they entered the country. They and their original attorney
acknowledge that motions they filed helped prolong the case.
That concession, however, is somewhat lost on the men, convinced that
their ongoing incarceration has as much to do with threats to the 1st
Amendment as to the laborious nature of the asylum process.
"We came to the beacon of free speech in the Western world," Sheppard
said, "which turned out to be a complete fantasy."
U.S. officials won't discuss the men's case, but U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement spokeswoman Virginia Kice in Orange County said
their visa waivers became invalid once they indicated to officers at
LAX that they intended to try to stay in the United States. She said
that U.S. authorities learned early on about the men's legal situation
in Britain and that it was a factor in their lengthy detention.
Brits are no strangers to irony, and Sheppard and Whittle are well
aware of its presence in their situation. "All they had to do," says
attorney Bruce Leichty, who represented them early in the case, "was
get off the plane in LAX and walk off into the free world."
Leichty, who no longer represents the men, said that U.S. officials
should have told them to find an asylum attorney and that the visa
waivers granted at a U.S. Port of Entry in Dublin should have protected
them from incarceration.
A federal immigration judge in Los Angeles disagreed. In October, Judge
Rose Peters sided with a government attorney who argued that officials
acted properly in detaining the men for further questioning after they
sought asylum.
Sheppard and Whittle were convicted in England for a string of essays
and other published material on Sheppard's heretical.com website, which
uses a server based in Torrance. Sheppard was convicted on 11 counts,
Whittle on five. In January, Sheppard was retried in absentia and
convicted on five more charges.
Their online entries follow the well-traveled path of other nationalist
polemicists, with particular emphasis on decrying the influence and
power of Jews in the world.
"People are entitled to hold racist and extreme opinions which others
may find unpleasant and obnoxious," Mari Reid, a lawyer for the Crown
Prosecution Service's Counter Terrorism Division in England said in a
prepared statement earlier this year about the case.
"What they are not allowed to do is to publish or distribute those
opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner
either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it
is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."
The vast majority of the material in this case concerned Jewish people,
Reid said, "but there was also material relating to black, Asian and
non-white people generally, all described in derogatory terms using
offensive language."
Because of the right-wing nature of much of their material, Sheppard
and Whittle believe Britain's Labor government has targeted them for
prosecution. That belief formed part of the basis for their asylum
request.
Sheppard, who sold computer equipment before he bolted to America, said
he considers himself more of a scientist interested in human behavior.
Whittle, a freelance writer, describes himself as an "anti-Marxist"
satirist who doesn't subscribe to all of the traditional extreme
right-wing positions, such as enmity toward gays or working women.
Sheppard said whatever anger he has is mostly directed at British
authorities. His feelings about America, he says, are not so much anger
"as sadness and disappointment, as we were led to believe that we would
be sympathetically received here by virtue of its tradition of free
speech."
That miscalculation aside, the men don't know when they will be
returned to Britain, and U.S. authorities won't say.
In denying asylum, Peters ruled that the men hadn't shown they had been
persecuted in the past or likely to face future persecution.
Sheppard and Whittle had hoped their story would attract media
attention, but that never materialized.
"I think it has very wide ramifications," Leichty says of their
convictions. "I don't share their views or the way they communicate
their views, but I certainly don't think we should be incarcerating
people for what they did."
Sheppard said he and Whittle are merely waiting for a
middle-of-the-night wake-up and a quick trip to the airport.
"We're not cowed and we're not repentant," Sheppard says. "We have the
right even to make mistakes. We could be wrong, it's not inconceivable.
We have a right to be wrong. All we're doing is speaking our minds."
Whittle says he isn't keen on making a career out of being a political
prisoner in England. "Simon is from Yorkshire," he says. "People from
Yorkshire are strong-willed. I'm not from Yorkshire. He sticks to his
guns. I don't have his willpower and tenacity."
After 11 months in custody, Whittle is not sure anymore that he and
Sheppard would have remained free even if they had quietly gone through
customs, left LAX and found a lawyer to handle their asylum request.
"Once they became aware of who we were and that we came to the U.S. to
flee," Whittle says, "we would have ended up in detention."
That is how it played out. Coming to America has been a bust.
"We've never seen California but through bars," Whittle says.