What lies ahead for the British
People's Party in the near and middle future? What sort of people will
we bring into the ranks of our ever growing Movement? What will our
tactics and long term strategy be? Let me be bold enough to make a few
and, I think, realistic predictions.....
As a founder member of the
original National Front in 1967, and still being around in this far
away year of 2008, I feel I am qualified to show how things in the late
1970's, with the NF then at its peak, and the situation in British
Nationalism NOW have many similarities. I can also show how the
situation in society - especially White society - has, in fact,
radically altered in our favour.
When I joined the NF in 1967, I
was eighteen years old, new to Nationalism and an original
mod-skinhead. Our membership in Yorkshire, of which NF region I a
couple of years later became Yorkshire organiser, was around thirty
people. Ten years down the line no less than 67,000 White men and women
had passed through the UK-wide ranks of the National Front and we were
a national powerful force to be reckoned with; especially on the
streets.
I do not mean to disparage what
is left of the NF today but, for me, the Front was an organisation
whose time come and gone was the 1970's - the NF is now a
part of political history but we can today learn many lessons from its
organisational and public successes. Its veterans have hugely useful
experience upon which we can all draw.
The 67,000 members of the 1970's
NF were not, of course, all members at the same time but at its 1978
peak it probably boasted around 15,000 to 20,000 members, dwarfing the
much lauded BNP of today (which starry eyed people new to Nationalism
think is the highest peak we have ever reached). True, the NF never
gained any councillors but it did gain some spectacular votes thereby
raising the profile of British Nationalism for the first time since the
end of the Second World War.
The May local election results
were impressive with the jewel in the crown being Leicester, where 48 candidates won 43,733 votes, nearly
20% of the total vote. By June the Party's growth rate was its highest
ever. This was emphasised in May 1977 when some outstanding local
election results were achieved: in particular 119,000 votes were cast
in favour of the NF in London and the Liberals were beaten in 33 out of 92
constituencies. This compares very well with the sort of votes the BNP
are getting today.
Again I will repeat that the
ex-UKIP and ex-Tory 'newbies' to Nationalism, , who are moving into the
'New BNP' as the veterans constantly move out, have no idea that we
have done all this before.
Another thing we have seen
before, too, and which resulted in split after split in the 1970's
National Front, was the continual striving to achieve a 'respectable
image'. Every attempt ended in failure. The splitters - populists and
liberal-nationalists - either quit politics for all time or returned
sheepishly to the NF which we real White Nationalists kept going
despite the upheavals caused by the splits.
The NF was destroyed between the
years 1978 and the early 1980's by a number of factors:
·
another massive split by the liberalisers, drawing
rebels into the short-lived National Front Constitutional Movement
·
a huge torrent of attacks by the Zionist controlled media at
all levels, including the sight of the Labour Party (now Marxist New
Labour) devoting a WHOLE party political broadcast to attacking the NF
·
street violence, which actually rebounded on the heads of the
Anti-Nazi League as it was blatantly obvious who was causing the street
trouble ( I have never met a member who was put off the NF by Red
violence against the marches and street demonstrations we constantly
held)
- the
media doing their best to equate the NF with violence
·
the
deadly lies of Margaret Thatcher, who blatantly misled the British
public with false, never to be fulfilled, Tory election pledges on
immigration ("I see a nation being swamped...")..
These combined factors lost
the NF hundreds of thousands of votes in the General Election of the 3rd May
1979. The NF was
slaughtered at the polls even though had Britain had a European style proportional style
representation system of election then the still enormous number of
votes would have ensured election of the first National Front members
of Parliament.
In 1979/1980 thousands left the
party.
This was exacerbated by the split
between the Tyndallites, who were revolted by the homosexuals around
the National Activities Organiser, Martin Webster, and who were coming
to dominate the movement. So, in 1982, John Tyndall formed the New
National Front, which quickly became the British National Party.
During the eighties the NF split
and re-split whilst the BNP, though not growing spectacularly, held
together, getting through the doldrums of the 1980's; until, after the
spectacular open air rallies in Darlington and Dewsbury of 1989, the
BNP kicked itself into the headlines.
During this time - remember -
Nick Griffin was thick in the seething troubles, wrecking what was left
of the NF. These troubles included Griffin’s own, assorted , financial debacles.
Eventually, as he led his NF faction into a Third Way obscurantist position, Griffin was declared bankrupt (he is now a fully
discharged bankrupt),.
From 1989 until John Tyndall was
disastrously ousted as Leader of the BNP he founded, the Party NEVER
had one split; in fact, in 1993, Derek Beacon of the BNP won the first
ever council seat, in the Millwall Ward of Towers Hamlets. The first
seat for the BNP and won under John Tyndall's leadership.
Since 1999, for reasons widely
speculated about, Nick Griffin has indeed captured around
100 Council and Parish council seats for the 'New BNP' and has raised
the membership to around a estimated 5,000 members. The flip side has
been the junking of all but a vestige of the fundamental
principles upon which the British National Party - the Movement
for which I fought for over the best part of two decades, until I
was frozen out in 1999 - was founded, leaving the 'New BNP' as an
anti-White Nationalist party.
The BNP has now formally
rejected White Nationalism (and, officially, the 14 Words) and has
instead opportunistically lined itself up behind a anti-Muslim,
pro-Israeli and pro-Zionist policy. The dropping of compulsory
repatriaton also leaves the BNP with a very hollow anti-immigration
policy, which in effect, should the BNP ever become the Government of
Great Britain, would not solve the race problems of Great Britain.
Now let us return to the 1980's.
As the National Front went into a
sharp decline a strange phenomenon happened. The ultra-radical British
Movement was originally founded by openly National Socialist Colin
Jordan (now, I am proud to say, a BPP supporter, though not a member)
and led by Michael McLoughlin, a hard working and honourable White
Nationalist.
Suddenly the BM's prospects
exploded in a flurry of new members (mostly ex-NF) and the new movement
started to hold marches numbering literally THOUSANDS of no-compromise
ultra-White Nationalists. Unfortunately, this promising development for
the British Movement was nullified by leadership problems. Another
interesting development with BM's sudden rise was how many normally
uncommitted Britons joined an openly National Socialist party!
Now fast forward again to 2008.
I see an almost exact parallel
between the NF/BM situation then and the BNP/BPP situation now. The
British People's Party is unique in that it does not proscribe other
nationalist organisations as a matter of principle and will work with
any sincere White patriot whether he or she is in the BPP or not.
Secondly we actively encourage dual membership, so BNP and other
Nationalists are welcome to stay in their own parties and still be
fully fledged members of the BPP. The BPP does, however, ask
senior party members who occupy key positions to put the interests of
our Movement first.
So, as the BNP drifts forever
more into the arms of the ZOG establishment - and I feel I have every
right to answer the question 'Why is this happening?' with the
observation that it is TRUE and that if we ever fear saying or printing
such truths we are finished as honest patriots - then the BPP will hold
the main line as a Movement keeping strictly to the founding principles
of the BNP.
These include, amongst many
others, phased compulsory repatriation Without these principles,
enshrined in the Fourteen Words 'We must secure the existence of our
people and a future for White children', White Nationalism ceases to
exist in Great Britain.
Eight years have gone by since
John Tyndall was ousted, then expelled and, finally, even proscribed by
Griffin for daring to raise a voice of criticism in the pages of the
now defunct Spearhead magazine, and yet, as Griffin leads the party
ever further into the murkier depths of Establishment politics, a few
misguided souls are still trying to oust him and reverse the
liberalisation process ( termed 'modenising' as a smoke screen for the
same old hopeless quest for 'respectability' - respectable to whom I
might add!).
Those still within the BNP who
are opposing Griffin so vehemently - and getting nowhere - need to
follow their consciences and join us. If John Tyndall couldn't do it
they are just hanging on to an indefensible position. Even worse there
are some violently opposed to Nick Griffin's leadership who would speed
the rush to liberalisation of the BNP even further and whose only
motivation for their opposition to Griffin and his coterie are emotions
motivated by personal spite and hatred rather than by solid ideological
and political arguments.
Something else is today vastly
different from the 1970's and 1980's and that is the attitude of the
White British people. They are becoming as radical, if not more
radical, than the BPP itself!
The nationwide racial and the
economic situations have now become so bad that the electorate are
either rejecting all parliamentarianism or voting for the BNP and any
other patriotic groups in bigger and bigger numbers. At long last, the
British masses are becoming radicalised to the extent that a White
Nationalist government is no longer a figment of the imagination or a
idealistic hope but a real reality!
BUT in order to be heard and to
be recognised by councillors, the people of Britain need a real
political alternative, a movement able and ready to voice
their fears, anger and concerns.
I submit that that movement MUST
be the BPP and no other. Half - baked Nationalist groups may get
initially good votes but those ordinary Britons who are voting for them
are voting for something they believe to be a truly White Nationalist
party - in most cases they are being misled.
So - to finalise. A great
vacuum has opened up in the field of White Nationalist
politics. That vacuum is waiting to be filled by a truly
forthright and open White Nationalist movement which has a street
presence and, as a firmly founded 'society within a society',
has thousands of members. The British public wants
and deserves a White Nationalist movement
and leadership which will be honestly representative of the
very angry mass of White Britons from all levels of society.
I will end again by saying, with every
ounce of experience and truth in my mind and body, that that Movement
MUST be the British People's Party! Act NOW for a better tomorrow and
join the BPP, the party of the future, TODAY!
WITH US AND ONLY US!
