‘Racism’ has come to be regarded by the politically-correct as the 8th deadly sin unaccountably overlooked by the ancient prophets. In politics, the media, literature ,education and common parlance the word is taken to encapsulate a noxious compound of bigotry and xenophobia which must never be allowed to escape into decent society. Not surprisingly, therefore, the ‘racist’ label is feared by anyone whose social standing and very livelihood might thereby be put at risk. Hence all the distortions of our language and stifling of open debate whenever the subject of race crops up.  So as grandmothers were wont to say:  ‘time we gave this a good airing’.

Most Third World immigrants are naturally prone to a sense of inferiority in Western society;  ‘it goes with the territory’ as people say.  And as we have seen, this all too easily becomes paranoid resentment sometimes exploding into violence against the host community. Not surprisingly then, the ‘racist’ jibe has been eagerly taken up as a weapon by disaffected immigrants generally and by all the usual suspects in the mass media , politics, education and the Establishment. It is now widely used to disparage, demonise, stifle or intimidate any overt expressions of patriotism.

The monstrous  Race Acts now overshadow our laws, institutions and very Constitution much as Marxism permeated countries in the former USSR. They have given the Establishment’s imprimatur to  all the grisly apparatniks, bureaucratic entanglements and poisonous publications of the Race Relations  Industry, eagerly sniffing out anything conceivably ‘racist’ in every nook and cranny of  Western society ; but seemingly incapable of detecting it anywhere else. 

Now it ought to be plain enough to everybody that no worthwhile judgements  or sensible discussion can take place without a shared understanding of the words to be employed.  Otherwise we are soon in the world of Humpty Dumpty who haughtily insisted that  ‘When I use a word it means just what I want it to mean, neither more nor less’. Which is the only kind of world in which ‘anti-racism’ thrives. 
 
Meanwhile the impartial observer can only conclude that nobody or anybody can be accused of ‘racism’ since it has no universally agreed definition.  It is like being accused of ‘non-conformism’ , since  you can’t  confirm or deny it without calling into question the notion of conformity. 

Thus the challenge rebounds upon itself.    

So let’s give this vexatious subject a  good airing.           

• Different races indisputably exist ;  the differences being in more or less prominent physical, mental and behavioural characteristics . The less immediately apparent differences such as  intellectual, inventive and creative capacity,  have been scientifically established beyond reasonable doubt and are in  any event historically self-evident ,  These differences may in some instances be blurred by miscegenation, but remain identifiable.  Thus a pure negro, for example, will never achieve the higher levels of caucasoid cleverness ; but a mulatto may approach them closer given favourable ‘white’genes .  So however wounding to their self-esteem, some racial types are just not equipped by nature to compete on equal terms with those of a more resourceful ancestry.
• The persistence of the different racial communities over several thousand years demonstrates their natural coherence plus  the so-called ‘territorial imperative’ whereby  alien intrusions are repelled.  Any significant admixture of genes and/or level of alien intrusion soon extinguishes the distinctive racial group so affected. This self-preservatory tendency to maintain an exclusive homeland for the race only tends to violence  when the scale of the alien invasion threatens its survival. . In other words it has to be seen as entirely legitimate self-defence .  Criticism of  patriotic defensiveness is therefore like attackers accusing their victims of aggression.     .
• True,  the  more advanced races have always sought to exploit the Third World for otherwise unavailable materials of one kind or another.   But this has not significantly changed the racial composition of the exploited countries, which  have undoubtedly profited themselves from encounters with Western culture.,
• ( And here be it noted that the slave trade was a long-established feature of African life before the arrival of European and American dealers, who were actively assisted by tribal chiefs).
• The much superior life-style of the more advanced races, now visible world-wide via television,  has of course  excited the envy of Third World peoples,  So being incapable of military conquest , they have exploited every other means to gain access to a much better mode of life within the curtilage of Western society.  
• Clearly these immigrants could not be said to thereby become  members of Western societies, since their admission in large numbers would obviously involve the eventual displacement and indeed disappearance of those societies  This mass migration to the West  has been enormously facilitated  by three agencies,  namely modern transport facilities, drug trafficking and the perfidy of  some Western governments.
• It has been largely financed by unscrupulous people-traffickers anddrug-dealers, using blackmail to coerce the illegal immigrants   involved .  Meanwhile the studied indifference or  self-serving collusion of renegade governments has presided over the most damaging invasion of this country in history.
• With an undeclared policy of open borders, these renegades have compounded their treachery by criminalising any overt resistance  to the alien invasion . And a major feature of the  associated
• propaganda has been promotion of ‘anti-racism’.; the term ‘racism’ itself being equated for this purpose  with irrational hatred of foreigners. Thus with all the resources of the Establishment and mass media at their disposal, renegade politicians have sought to replace the concept of patriotism with a  cosmopolitan fiction. But of course so-called ‘multi-culturalism’ is inherently socially divisive, since any active  culture seeks to expand its power, influence and territory at whatever cost to its rivals.
• To take the obvious examples,  churches, temples, mosques and synagogues cannot occupy the same ground ; schools cannot have a standard curriculum and ethos, working conditions and practices  cannot accommodate grossly disparate races and their incompatible religions; hospital staff cannot control infection wearing Third World clothing;  the supply of certain foodstuffs becomes unnecessarily complicated;  meanwhile the law, administration of justice and policing are compromised to accommodate a bewildering variety of racial minorities, and the English language is mangled by absurd constraints on everyday speech.

In short, so-called ‘multi-culturalism’ is always at the expense of the indigenous population.    

• Concerning all the ‘anti-discrimination’ laws, they require disloyalty to one’s own kind , since discrimination is indivisible from loyalty.in everybody’s experience. And be assured that very few immigrants are in the habit of disloyalty to their own kind.
• Immigration is the  sincerest form of inter-racial flattery;  a fact on which all the immigrants’ complaints founder and which invalidates all their attempts to change the indigenous culture.
• There are no Third World asylum-seekers in Britain;  all claiming that title are economic migrants since they could easily have moved to safe countries adjacent to their homeland.
• Beyond the role of ad hoc hireling or casual labour, no negroid, Asian or other alien is capable of representing the interests of  the British people in any capacity whatsoever.
• If ever it made sense to sacrifice several million of our best and bravest to defend the homeland against would-be French, Spanish and German invaders, why have we surrendered this country to non-European races  without a shot being fired? Against the historical background of British wars for survival, therefore, these aliens cannot be regarded as anything other than enemy invaders.  Given the choice, a successful invasion of Britain by almost any European power would be preferable.     
• It follows that anybody facilitating or cooperating in the alien occupation of Britain is a party to the political betrayal.  Such people do not deserve  all the rights and privileges of British citizenship, since they have failed to protect them.
• It is against this background that ‘anti-racism’ has to be judged., since as we have seen, ‘racism’ is a catch-all term of abuse with no more substance than ‘nonconformism’. (The grin of the Cheshire cat comes to mind). Accordingly, the fact that you  wish to preserve the identity, character, freedom and security of your ancestral homeland and much prefer the company of your own kind makes you a patriot, not a ‘racist’ . Those who contend otherwise naturally include unwanted immigrants and people lacking any sense of loyalty to race and nation. The same people who shout ‘racist’ would have to call the Battle of Britain pilots ‘warmongers’. 
• As to the future, voluntary and involuntary repatriation will give our country back to its own people. Dealing with faithless elements in the indigenous population and draining the toxic reservoirs of political treachery will necessarily involve the following measures:

a) Public trial and exemplary punishment of the most treacherous Establishment figures and politicians; and lost or curtailed citizenship for their senior rank-and-file apparatniks; (And here remember that the so-called Nuremberg defence ‘we  were only obeying orders’ was ruled inadmissible. We shall make the same ruling.)                
                  
b)  A radical purge of all subversive personnel and materials in the mass media, legislature and education;
                 
         
You just read a part of the real Nationalist Manifesto.       .
         
The heart and soul of any nation consists of  a rather small minority in whom a  patriotic sense of duty  burns brightly whichever way the political wind blows. Mired in public apathy, maligned by the mass media and persecuted by officialdom , this stalwart minority carries a burden as great as any borne by our most illustrious ancestors.

And be assured of this: Whatever your personal achievements and claims to respect, if you are not among them you will never be more than manure in the garden of Western civilization .