|
"IT'S ALL GIVE AND TAKE...WE GIVE, THEY TAKE..." It is important to examine what multiculturalism has become, or rather what it is in reality and the sort of people behind it. The original and basic notion that the theory works 'in principle' is espoused by a great many soft line multiculturalists - these are the people who form the rank and file of the movement, not really possessing any political clout or drive to influence the decision making process but legitimately wishing for "something better" for society through this policy - a bit like someone desperately wanting to believe that a magic trick is real - he knows it can't be, but deep down he believes... Then there are the hard line multiculturalists. Academics, self-interest groups, ethnic/minority groups and other assorted industries who use mirror-speak and guilt-complex methods to hijacking the original concept of genuinely-held multiculturalist policy. They use these methods to pursue multiculturalism purely for political motives. Each of these preys on those soft line multiculturalists like con-artists selling time-share or a pyramid scheme. One such self-interest group taking full advantage of the cultural, ethnic and religious divisions within our society are the politicians who play the game of 'divide and conquer'. Simply put a politicians goal is to achieve power and wealth - if a policy of 'multiculturalism' is the shortest path to that power and wealth, then so be it. Splitting society through the introduction of incompatible races, colours, religions and creeds into the demographic means that only small pockets of dis-united resistance to their megalomania must be faced at any one time. Established political parties engage in blatant branch stacking, often by using ethnic groups who give their allegiance to the party in block form through their "community leaders" in return for favourable policy treatment. However those in charge of the established political parties cannot be so shortsighted as to believe that the ethnic minorities will always have this allegiance? Consider a scenario where the ethnic community in question becomes large enough to field its own candidates. Or that ethnic community forms its own political party with a view to overturning and implementing laws specific to them. Both these scenarios are real and happening as we speak. Evidently, the politicians of today don't care. By the time the brown stuff hits the fan, they will be long gone - enjoying their large pensions in their quiet rural property far away. They might even have moved into another political role perhaps in the United Nations or European Union where lucrative salaries, lurks, perks, backhanders and other trimmings are paid for doing nothing to very little. Failure to toe the multiculturalist line early in his career will ensure a politician is not considered for these positions. With unemployment reaching unbelievable levels (or did you believe it was 5%?), crime is growing out of control, hospitals and schools are closing down, roads and other infrastructure needs are being neglected, the politicians need a diversionary tool. Cue multiculturalism and yet another "carnivale" or "celebration" just like the Romans and their games. Only this time they blow ridiculous amounts of money on fireworks and glittering lights instead of lions and tigers - but we still stand and cheer it all on. In order to disarm the population and ensure it allows massive waves of third world immigration that comes with the multiculty experiment, a society must be relieved of its sense of national, cultural, racial, historical or religious pride. This is achieved through the method of over-emotional, guilt-complex arguments in every instance. Consequently an individual must feel guilty about living in a society which is generally, "richer", "better fed", "more intelligent", "better housed", "better armed" and "better hospitalised" and begin to empathise with governments and peoples who aren't, to the point of nervous breakdown! This position stems from the fact that most hard line backers of multiculty policy are actually doing all right themselves, living in the nicest part of town, well schooled and well fed. But as "socialists" these new aristocrats feel a pervading sense of guilt - the burden of which is passed onto the average citizen to bear. This is reflected in the ever-changing rules governing speech. If someone were to say in conversation that they are "proud to be white" in any environment, it would be deemed to be an official declaration that they are a card-carrying member of the K.K.K. In a work environment, if you aren't sacked you will be blackballed and marginalised by other worker drones who have been conditioned to feel guilty about themselves and are prepared to denounce anyone else through fear of similar happening to them if they don't. To atone for the sin of defending the truth of living in a much better society (witnessed also by the amount of people wanting entry) you are obliged to enter a very Orwellian like "diversity-training/re-education" programme. The idea with these courses is that the more racial and cultural suicide through open-borders multiculturalism we agree to commit, the more we denounce our own side and others and the more deference we show to someone else ON THE BASIS OF RACE the more "sorry" we are for some perceived grievance to one or other arbitrarily selected group. The similarity of methods and ideology you see from today's multiculturalists and that of Stalin and Mao are not accidental. In fact, Marxist theory goes right to its core as it believes in the continued class (now cultural) struggle against oppression, equality for everyone and the "collective" environment of mind and body for the good of the cause. Because we have allowed these thoughts to permeate through society without question, sometimes even believing it to be a 'harmless ideology' and even playing along, as in the case of political correctness, Multiculturalist theory, even with its self-evident failings and irrational logic has been allowed to become axiomatic. The new faith adhered to with as much fanaticism as any religion so claimed by the left, establishing itself as the new god that cannot be questioned, scrutinised or rejected. What might surprise many multicultural leftists, who use mobile phones in a McDonalds restaurant on their way to the anti-globlisation rally, is the political weight that the capitalist system has brought to bear on the success of multiculturalism. In fact, it could be described as the central cog to the whole wheel for without the need for business interests, the policy has no reason to be propelled. As we know, there is a huge amount of money to be made in China, Indonesia, India, Niger, Mexico and others thus it is important to secure contracts for manufacturing, mining, repairing, drilling, shipping/containing and telephony etc - this is commonly known as "outsourcing". Unfortunately, the third world want their pound of flesh in return, hence the opening up of the first world to all manner of third worlders in an minimally supervised quid pro quo. A clear example of this attitude can be seen with the publishing of a set of cartoons supposedly depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammed by a Danish newspaper. These harmless cartoons, and they were harmless by Islamic standards, not only caused major uproar in amonst Muslims around the world thus proving the point of the cartoonists but also sent the business world in a spin. The obscene greed for profits and loss of lucrative middle-eastern contracts trumped freedom of speech and the ability to freely criticise, the weak-kneed politicians let us down once more with their snivelling apologies. This business-cultural relationship is also reinforced in free-trade agreements like NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) which involves Canada, the United States and Mexico - the trouble on the US-Mexican border is well documented, but don't look for it to be solved by politicians who are also keen to pursue a North American "EU" anytime soon. This concept is even expanding toward CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement). What this all means is that, not only are we sending our jobs overseas, but the overseas unemployed and unskilled are coming here as well. This effectively makes the world a single labour market with the western world workers competing with the coolies of the third world. As big business gets bigger, the choice of where to work becomes less and less therefore the bidding war to see who can offer the lowest price for their labour will begin. Of course this is one war we will lose before it even starts as we cannot hope to compete with someone willing to make shoes in Burma for five cents a week. In summary, the multiculturalists and the theory they support have become the sort of people they claim to want to stop others from becoming, "intolerant, totalitarian and fascist." Prepared to defend this 'faultless' ideology by implementing whatever it takes going so far as to ban points of view as with "holocaust denial" which could land a person in jail in many parts of the world, even for simply questioning the veracity of the holocaust industries claims. Meanwhile the same politicians and supporters of such legislation will wax-lyrical about "liberal" societies, "freedom of speech", "diversity" and "democracy" at election time. In reality, it is about none of these things, it is about control.
|
© 2008 British People's Party, BM Box 5581, London WC1N 3XX
