Nationalist Alliance - Our Flag - Our People - Our Symbol
contacts
b7
join
donate
merchandise
links



NATIONALIST WEEK No.39 27th February 2005

The weekly online bulletin of the Spearhead Group

 

H. L. Mencken:

“The notion that a radical is one who hates his country is naïve and usually idiotic. He is, more likely, one who likes his country more than the rest of us, and is thus more disturbed than the rest of us when he sees it debauched. He is not a bad citizen turning to crime; he is a good citizen driven to despair.”

 

 

Contents:-

1 .Do NOT fear the System

2. Front National Repressed

3. Tess Culnane de-selected as BNP candidate

4. Donations appeal

5. Lord of the Rings – the epilogue

6. Forthcoming events

7. John Tyndall in Halifax – a reminder

 

DO NOT FEAR THE SYSTEM!

(This is part of “White Revolution” by American White Nationalist, Billy Roper, though we have to edit it somewhat to conform to repressive British Law we hope it covers some of what Comrade Roper is trying to get across. Apologies to Billy for our editing. To read his writings check out www.whiterevoltion.com)

Fear plays an important role in maintaining the oppressive regime; if there is a great fear amongst the subjects then, like a whipped dog, even minor sanctions will produce conformity. It is to be embedded in the minds of our folk that fear does not contribute to the cessation of cruelties, it contributes to their continuation. There should be no shock or dismay at repression-it is the result of our enemy’s recognition that we are a serious threat to their regime. As our campaign continues we can anticipate our civil liberties will be even further reduced. There will be a point in time when it is necessary for us to possible break the System’s laws and reassert our rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. At such a moment the characteristics of boldness and persistence will become indispensable for the prolongation of the movement. Bravery should not be considered a moral virtue, but rather a practical requirement.

There is no greater coward in the movement than the person who refuses to become active under the pretense they are a mere foot soldier and are just biding their time and keeping a low profile until the Great Day dawns. They are so afraid of losing their job working the graveyard shift at Wal-Mart, cleaning toilets in high-rise office buildings or changing bed sheets at the Motel 6 that they won’t attend a demonstration, yet they would have us believe they will be standing shoulder-to-shoulder with us during the struggle for our race. As long as the majority of those supposedly on our side hide behind anonymous user names on internet message boards those few who stand up for their race are at a high risk of public exposure and a high vulnerability to punishment. There are two kinds of people on the internet: those won’t use their real name because they are concerned about the safety of their job and the welfare of their family and those who use their real name because they are concerned about the safety of their job and the welfare of their family. If we can pry the keyboards from their cold, dead fingers and get a fraction of those 35,000 Stormfronters out of their Comfy Chair and into the streets, to pay more attention to activism than to their post count, then the situation would take a sudden turn. There would be less exposure and the chances of being singled out for punishment would be disproportionately reduced. Consequently more people would be willing to participate. We must keep in mind that a change towards fearlessness and self-confidence is not a curtain to be dramatically drawn; it must come across by inches and degrees. Think baby steps. Low-risk, confidence-building public activism is a means of shedding the layers of fear. Understandably, certain camps will become less afraid than others. The magnitude to which the participants have become fearless will determine the specific type of action possible. If we push our supporters too far and too fast they will lose their nerve midway across the bridge and the bridge will collapse.

Promoting the idea of an underground resistance is the worst thing that ever happened to our movement. For starters, there is no underground resistance, but the most important single objection to this concept is not only is it rooted in fear, but it contributes to fear. It contributes to paranoia and finger-pointing and reinforces the belief that victory is unattainable. To deal openly and honestly is to operate from a position of strength. Only small, insignificant entities believe violence is their only alternative. Secrecy and conspiratorial behavior might seem like a reasonable approach under present circumstances; however the consequences of the courage involved in open action strikes especially hard at the heart of a system characterized by the instillation of terror and submissiveness in its subjects. Serious attempts to maintain secrecy allows the sensation of fear to spread-fear that plans will be discovered, fear that leaders will be captured, fear that the organization will be broken, fear that key members and masses of followers will be rounded up and imprisoned. The spirit of the resistance will be dampened and potential supporters deterred. Instead of demonstrating to our enemies and to our kinsmen that repression is powerless, fear permeates the movement. Degeneration and demoralization proliferates. Arguments in favor of secrecy seem to assume that it is not too difficult to keep government agencies from finding out exactly what it is that is to be kept secret. While it may be possible to keep certain subjects secret for some time, it is likely that sooner or later the police will learn not only the general intentions but even the most microscopic details of the plan as well. Modern electronic devices will be used in addition to the time-honored traditional methods of opening the mail, wiretapping, informants, police spies and undercover agents. Moreover, their use will be seen as justified by the public at large. Openness as simply an assertion of moral principle has little relevance. We are not concerned with the moral righteousness of our manners, but with the psychological, social and political effect of our behavior. A movement that is overly security conscious will need to reduce the number of people who plan and execute the key policies, while overall numbers will be reduced by the alienation of partisan persons and sympathizers who naturally distrust secret political organizations, especially in what is perceived to be a liberal democratic form of government. In the struggle to obtain freedom we must behave like free men, and free men do not engage in secret, underground movements.

 

(Nationalist Week comment: We could no agree more and hence we are reprinting this. Paranoia and cowardice breed more paranoia and cowardice. The System is powerful but it is NOT all powerful! We must stand up proudly as White men and women willing to be known and to fight for our beliefs openly and without fear. That is and has always been the Aryan way!)

 

FRONT NATIONAL REPRESSED!

The Paris Appeal Court has upheld a fine of €10,000 euros
of April 2004, against Jean-Marie Le Pen for "incitement to racial hatred"
for a controversial statement he made about Moslems in 2003.

The president of the National Front was also ordered to publish this

judgement in the daily Le Monde and to pay €5,000 damages to the
Ligue des droits de l'homme - League of Human Rights, which was a private
party associated with the public prosecutor.


However, the other private party LICRA - Ligue Internationale contre le
racisme et l'antisémitisme = International League against racism and
anti-Semitism - was not admitted.

 

In an interview to Le Monde in April 19, 2003, Jean-Marie Le Pen is quoted
as saying: "The day when in France we have no longer 5 million but 25 million
Moslems, they will be the ones who will command (...) and the French will
have to hug the walls, get off the footpaths while lowering their eyes, and
the only option for you will be to dash about, otherwise you'll get slapped".


The president of the FN, 76, had come in person to the hearing in January in
order to claim responsibility for his words: "Nothing can be worse for a
people than to lose its independence. That's what happened to us during
World War II, and that's what threatens us with
Europe and the immigration",
he said.


Since January Le Pen is also under a preliminary police enquiry for "challenging
crimes against humanity" (the French equivalent of German 'Holocaust' laws)

after his remarks about German war-time occupation of France. France after Germany is fast emerging as one of the most repressive European ZOG regimes.

 

 

TESS CULNANE DE-SELECTED AS BNP CANDIDATE! – Tess tells her own version to

Nationalist Week.

(We report this as Lecomber is currently putting out untrue statements regarding Tess)

As you already know Tony Lecomber has refused to nominate me as a Prospective BNP Parliamentary Candidate for Bexley & Sidcup Kent.

I would like, at this point, to give my version of the facts leading up to his accusations.

 

At a meeting held in Chelsea I was chosen as the mayoral candidate and I was extremely proud and pleased to accept the nomination.  Shortly afterwards my husband and I attended the RWB family weekend. My only reason for attending was to enjoy the Lancashire countryside and spend a couple of days with fellow nationalists. Nothing else was in my mind.

 

When I arrived at the RWB site at the entrance I was approached by Colin Smith who asked me if I would speak later on in the day, which caught me off guard somewhat because I hadn't prepared a speech.  Colin then spoke, in front of me, to Nick Griffin and suggested to him that it would be a perfect occasion to introduce me as the Mayoral Candidate for London.  Nick Griffin agreed and told me to be in the big tent at 2.20pm and I would be given 10 minutes to address the assembly.  I immediately prepared a short speech and duly arrived in the big tent at 1.45pm giving plenty of time.

 

I listened to a couple of speakers before Tony Lecomber took the stage - he spoke about party strategy and the fact that we wouldn't win the Mayoral Election.  Not once did he acknowledge me as the candidate and as I have already stated he completely dismissed the chances of winning the Mayoral Election -prophetic as it turns out. Even so - what a statement to make in front of nearly a thousand people!   To say the least I felt humiliated and demoralised because this was very important to me and I was entering this race to win.  He then went on to give out prizes and it became obvious that he had no intention of introducing me as the Mayoral Candidate, let alone allowing me to speak as agreed.

 

A few days after coming home I decided I couldn't work with this man because of his contemptuous attitude.  I, therefore, decided to withdraw from the Mayoral Campaign and I phoned him with the intention of telling him this, which I did.  I also e-mailed Nick with my decision and told him why; he gave me the impression that he was annoyed with Lecomber and said that he would have a words with him.  Julian Leppart then became the candidate.

 

So I feel on this occasion Lecomber let me down and as far as I knew that was the end of my involvement with the GLA and Euro election, until I was informed that I was on the BNP website as a GLA candidate this was a complete surprise to me because I was never asked whether I wanted to be a candidate.  Next I was told that someone had put my name forward

as a MEP candidate (another surprise).

 

I decided to phone Lecomber and ask for an explanation as he hadn't even extended me the courtesy to inform me that I was on the list.  When I spoke to him I asked whether I was on both lists, he said rather curtly – “Oh no you can't be on both.”  Bear in mind I don't know who put my name on the website in the first place, but whoever it was must have had it cleared by Lecomber.   When I next checked the website my name was on both lists.  I told the London Election Organiser to remove my name from the list of MEP candidates as I was only interested in the GLA.

I remained on both lists and phoned Lecomber to question this. He had the audacity to say to me –“you've been promoted Tess you are now on both lists.”

 So I just accepted the fact that the party was doing the best they could with the candidates they had.

 

Yet another time Lecomber treated me with contempt - I phoned him and asked if there was anywhere that he didn't want me to speak, his reply - with a heavily sarcastic inflection in his voice was – “Speak anywhere you like, if they'll have you.”

 

That was the last time I spoke to him.

 

Next thing I know my name was called out at the recent rally as a potential candidate for the General Election.  Richard Barnbrook asked me to stand in Uxbridge, Ian Edwards’s area; of course I told him what to do with his offer and suggested he reinstate Ian as he was the man for the job.  Richard Barnbrook then offered me Bexley & Sidcup which was already on the website.  I asked him if he had checked with the all-powerful Lecomber and he said yes and he (Lecomber) was quite happy with it.

Colin Smith then informed me that Lecomber was adamant that he would not sign my nomination papers.

 

Apart from personal issues with Lecomber, the damage both he and Nick Griffin are doing to this party is beyond belief and I hope that before long something positive happens.

Tess Culnane. 

 

(Editors note: Tess Culnane is one of the most popular and effective speakers on the White Nationalist circuit. Her treatment and the junking of her as Parliamentary BNP Candidate when she is still a fully paid-up member of the BNP is horrendous – BUT not unexpected! We are carrying this article as we feel Tess needs some right of redress to the way she has been treated and to the accusation from Lecomber that Tess “has let me down too often”) 

 

DONATIONS ALWAYS NEEDED – MORE THAN EVER!

We had a great collection for the SG at last week’s Milton Keyne’s meeting, but with our widening agenda and constant influx of members, the flow of cash into and out of (!) our small coffers is vital. We have day to day running costs but also longer term plans of which the establishment of a Nationalist Centre and the purchase of an A2 Colour Laser printer, together with a monthly broadsheet are some. Not to mention the need to upgrade existing PC technology now getting a bit long in the tooth.

We will soon have a new Spearhead account – details of which will appear on our website. In the meantime give whatever you can to –

Imperium Press, PO Box 36, Armley, Leeds LS12 2YE.

 

LORD OF THE RINGS – THE EPILOGUE

This article is being held over to next weeks “Nationalist Week” due to lack of space, but is the unknown and never before published epilogue to the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy. Briefly it tells of the story of a steadfast Western Kingdom and the Shire which are happy and content and unified in purpose to oppose the Dark Armies of Mordor under the evil Sauron, a creature described as a ‘blarebush’ – a malignant entity from the Netherworld.

This blairbush, Sauron subverts the wizard Saruman, once thought to be a true White wizard but who has fallen under the spell of arrogance and greed and wishes to take over the Western Kingdoms and subvert the Shire. He is greatly helped in this by one Grimer Wormtongue, a shadowy and slimy character who was thought once to be a true fighter for the Western Lands ideals but who sees the return of Saruman as his chance to unseat the true Leader and Founder of the Western Lands – Théoden and change the order of things to fall in line with Sauron’s wishes. Their main difficulty is Theodin’s threatened return after his second expulsion and the fact that Saruman and Wormtongue must forever be twisting and turning with lies and deceit to keep the Hobbits and Western men fooled into thinking they are still fighting the Dark Armies…the full story next week!

SG/NATIONALIST MEETINGS, Lancs

We are awaiting a date for a March Lancs meeting. This will probably be the third week in March. Full details in TRUTH which will be going out by post to all members this week. If you want a copy of this informative bulleting – JOIN!

 

Saturday afternoon April 23rd SG St.George’s Day Social, Bradford. Buffet, quiz and lots more! The room is now booked. We are thinking of having a “Weakest Link” style quiz too and there will also be a Long Service Award to White Nationalism presentation to a veteran comrade who will be Guest of Honour on the day. Bradford SG are organising the buffet. Get ready for a great St. George’s Day!

 

SOCIAL for St.George’s Day, Lancs.

The Blackburn SG is holding a St. George’s Day social on Friday 22nd April. - 7pm till late. – Blackburn - call 07833 677484 for full details. All comrades welcome.

 

SG AUGUST CAMP/SOCIAL WEEKEND – we are currently considering a White Nationalist weekend, possibly in Lancs. Families especially welcome and also single young men!!! (Refused by the RWB of Griffin’s? Well then come to the SG one!)

 

JOIN THE SPEARHEAD GROUP!

Just e-mail us your name and postal address so we can take you on board as an Official Supporter. Fight for White Nationalism and protect its principles with the SG! Due to the large number of people joining, there is now an annual fee of £5.00 to cover postage and other costs. Please download the SG Application form on our website and send with fee (“Imperium Press”).

 

JOHN TYNDALL IN HALIFAX

Supporters are reminded that John Tyndall will have to appear at Halifax Police Station on Wednesday April 6th. SG members and supporters will be on hand to ensure he has support. The case against Mr.Tyndall is stupid in the extreme and we confidently hope that the farce will be dropped and John Tyndall will walk out that day without any nonsensical Race charges being levelled by the semi-hysterical tyranny that passes for the New labour Regime of former Marxist agitator and now Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, once a self-confessed radical Marxist and a vocal red member of Hackney council in its loony left hay-day. God help us that this ex-Communist (?) now sits in judgement over millions of patriotic Britons!

 

The Spearhead Group, PO Box 36, Armley, Leeds LS12 2YE.

Spearhead Group
PO Box 36, Armley, Leeds LS12 2YE

General Enquiries: 07904297553

Admin Enquiries: 07708861198

 

E-MAIL ADDRESSES

How to reach us by e-mail…

All e-mail for the attention of the Spearhead Group should be sent to

sg-bnp@redwhiteblue.net

All e-mail for Nationalist Week

natweek@redwhiteblue.net

 

Visit our website www.rwb.org.uk

Imperium Press produces Nationalist Week freely as an online news e-zine. To subscribe just send an e-mail to natweek@redwhiteblue.net

If you received this bulletin unsolicited then just send an e-mail with “Unsubscribe” to the above e-mail address. If the bulletin was passed on to you from another source and

you did not want it – then contact whoever forwarded it to you.

 

Nationalist Week is Copyright Imperium Press 2005

It may be freely distributed as long as no part is altered, changed or deleted in any way.

 

 

© 2005 British People's Party, BM Box 5581, London WC1N 3XX