Germany's democratic system of repression runs amok

The German system fosters a weird understanding of freedom and democracy. It is no longer the so-called neo-Nazis alone who are hunted down by Germany's persecution machinery if they dare to utter a "politically incorrect" word. Any original document stemming from the Hitler-era is kept under lock. The political system made it a criminal offence to publish material from the Third Reich that is not tampered with by the system because post-war Germany was founded on holocaust lies. It is only logic that this kind of foundation will eventually cause a devastating tremor that brings the system down. As long the system was able to camouflage its politics of repression by pointing at skinheads, it got away with it. Now, however, the whole world becomes aware of a system that goes berserk. Whether it is clerical dignitaries, main stream publishing houses or system historians, the German system hunts them down like skinheads, if their views of the Hitler era differ from the fabricated system historiography. The German political system seems to take pride in acting as arch-enemies of human rights. They seem mad enough to believe that their pathetic East-German way of democracy, which is beyond remedy, could be saved for the day by applying more despotic measures on the public every day. It is sheer lunacy, but as desperate as they are, they can't see it. They don't see that the end of lies has come. Please read the latest from persecution paradise:

Daily Mail (online) – London - 26th January 2009

German government sues British publishers for selling thousands of Nazi era newspapers

By Daily Mail Reporter

Mr McGees project "Zeitungszeugen".

German police are confiscating 280 copies of a publication of Nazi newspapers reprinted by a British company.

Authorities have announced they will sue the publishing for printing and disseminating Nazi symbols such as the swastika, which is a criminal offence in Germany.

London-based Albertas will  also be charged with breach of copyright laws, as the publishing rights for the Nazi-era newspapers lay with the German government

Supported by notable German historians, the project, to examine the history of the country’s media, was launched two weeks ago and became an instant bestseller across the country.

The decision to confiscate remaining issues and take the publishers to  court comes after the state of Bavaria announced last week that it had sole copyright of the Nazi papers issued between 1933 and 1945.

Bavarian officials demanded a stop to publication and a recall of any remaining copies currently on sale. 

A spokesman for the Bavarian government said that republishing Nazi newspapers meant confronting Holocaust survivors with their suffering and it  also posed a danger of disseminating National Socialist propaganda.

The first issue of reprints edition, which is available for £3.50, includes the Nazi paper Der Angriff, or Attack, from January 30, 1933, announcing that Adolf Hitler became German chancellor.

The headline story is  accompanied with an anti-Semitic commentary by Josef Goebbels, editor of  the paper and Hitler’s propaganda minister.

The reprints come with commentaries which explain the historical context and dissect the Nazis' propaganda tricks.

According to the CEO of the publishing house Peter McGee, the project was conceived solely for educational purposes and would only serve to introduce historic truth to readers rather that promote Nazism.

Mr McGee has also rejected claims that his company was in violation of copyright and as it was 'completely unclear' whether the state indeed owned rights to the Nazi publications.

Mr Gee said: 'We will clarify this in court.'

Bavaria, where Hitler once lived, is known for its restrictive policy towards reprinting Nazi publications and has also blocked plans to reprint Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

The British publishing project has divided the German public, with some  greeting the idea as useful, while others, including Charlotte Knoblauch, the  head of the country’s Central Jewish Council, have opposed the publication.