We have spoken briefly about the methods used by politicians, academics and other vested interests to promote the theory of multi-culturalism and an open-borders society, but all would be for nought if their ideas were not validated by a "higher authority". Atheism, which runs rampant in the left, rules out the possibility of god, or even a particular god. Therefore that persona is replaced by an easily manipulated organisation called the United Nations.

This organisation, based in New York, was established at the end of World War Two as the victorious powers from that conflict sought to keep an eye on the world and each other. Like its predecessor the League of Nations however, it faces a slide into oblivion as its commitment and complicity on key issues has been called into serious question.

Firstly, the United Nations has by numerical advantage degenerated into a third world talkshop, headed by Africans, Asians and to a slightly lesser extent Latin Americans. In effect, 'lunatics running the asylum'. This inglorious farce called the United Nations was further exposed when the United Nations recently appointed Libya to chair its "human rights committee". Sudan is also in line to take over this position shortly and Iraq was due to take over the "Nuclear Disarmament Committee" before hostilities broke out in that country.

 

 

This organisation which supposedly promotes "democracy" is anything but democratic. In fact, it operates more like the powerful medieval Catholic church. That is a rich, unelected, unquestionable core who hold moral authority over all "beneath" them and who will exercise "excommunication" to those who don't tow the line, whilst in the process, the United Nations achieves little of note. Where for example are the United Nations and the "humanitarians" that support the organisation regarding Rwanda or more recently, Zimbabwe or Sudan?

 

In addition, the Member States have not asked the people whether or not they would like to be involved in the United Nations, either at election time or through a referendum. Treaties, Agreements and Protocols are not brought to the people for consideration or even knowledge, instead they are signed and adhered to and implemented in a typically socialist "father-knows-best" style of Government.

Two examples of these unendorsed treaties which immediately spring to mind are Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the International Criminal Court (ICC). These treaties seem to be very noble in name, however the CRC serves to drive another wedge into the traditional family unit, which is under attack from many mischievous quarters. It pits a newly emboldened child who has found their "rights" against parents who are increasingly being taught how to parent. Meanwhile, little is being done about the child labour in Pakistan or India or the out of control child prostitution in South-East Asia.

 

We must also proceed with caution with an "International Criminal Court". Such a court, is not exclusively (if at all) for the Mugabes or Saddams of this world, it more intended as a means to chase "nazis" - nazis being the fashionable "war/thought/hate criminal" of the day - this ICC has the ability to subpoena ordinary citizens to an overseas court without needing approval from that person's home Government. Little by little our sovereignty is being removed, with full complicity by our politicians - elected by you.

Another important aspect of the United Nations that has been allowed to become axiomatic by virtue of repetition is this idea that the United Nations has now officially become the 'World-Government' exercising it's 'Power' through 'International-Law'. This is typical leftist propaganda repeated by many who cannot question. Although it is true that 'International Law' exists, it doesn't exist to the extent that these Marxists suggest. Instead it comes in the form of agreements signed, again without the knowledge of the people which they cover, by complicit governments.

In other words, these agreements/protocols and treaties can and should be repealed by sovereign states should it no longer be practical to apply them. Therefore, the power of the United Nations exists solely on the basis of agreement of its member states.

A food-for-oil scandal which alleges embezzlement and fraud between those who stayed away from the recent conflict in Iraq; namely France, Germany, the Secretary-General Kofi Anan and  his son Kojo, has cast serious doubt on the ability of the organisation to be the impartial policeman it proclaims itself to be in its preamble - which is probably a good thing as it was never intended to be a world government, much less a Marxist world government.

Of course these things we have spoken about today are merely the tip of the iceberg for an organisation which needs to be dismantled, as soon as possible.