
|
What’s the
Point?
An incisive article by Bill Bailie >Minority
parties like to imagine that they will one day come to power. They talk
about
forming a government and implementing policies as though there’s a real
chance
of it happening. That’s probably why they attach such importance to
points of
policy and spend so much time writing detailed manifestos and expelling
each
other. After the war the survivors of internment joined with returned servicemen to found Union Movement and fight for By the mid Seventies the NF had grown into a nationwide movement that could put thousands of people on the streets and dominate the headlines. They looked set to change the face of British politics. But in 1979 Margaret Thatcher virtually destroyed them as a political force by saying that she understood people’s fears of being swamped by immigration.
On the one hand they are appeasing public opinion and on the other they are prosecuting members and supporters of the far right with repressive legislation. The BNP have managed to push the government some way towards immigration control. In that respect they have been successful. But they still dream of coming to power and consider their manifesto to be cast in stone; even though their supporters are voting against immigration and do not study their policies. Oswald
Mosley got 8% in Kensington North in 1959 for Union Movement. John
Bean got 9% in Southall in 1964 for the original British National Party. John Tyndall got 7% in Hackney South in 1979 for the National Front. The leaders and writers of the far right will not be manning the barricades in the near future. They will not be marching on the capital like Benito Mussolini at the head of his Blackshirts; they are not supported by millions of unemployed ex-servicemen like Adolf Hitler; and they cannot call on the army like Francisco Franco. Their only hope is the ballot box that is already rigged in favour of the powers that be. So what’s the point? The point is that they can change things and have already started to do so. They should stop fantasising about coming to power and continue to concentrate on building a viable political movement that can influence events. They are unlikely to form a government but they can influence public opinion and government policy. There’s nothing wrong with standing for parliament. It is good training for the troops, it gets publicity and it attracts donations. And if your candidate can divert enough votes to unseat an old gang MP so much the better. But it’s a foolish flight of fancy to think that Nick Griffin will ever come to power. BPP comment: We are reproducing this article with Bill's consent. In the main it reflects some BPP strategy. We are certain that elections alone cannot gain us power. It has to be a mixture - elections; infiltration of the State's apparatus; the building of a White Nationalist state within a mass movement ready to take power. Elections MUST be fought - for publicity and to harden our own activists - but at the same time the building of the Organic Mass Movement takes precedence - Recruitment above all! |